2:50 “It is not difficult to do some basic research”(Computing Forever)
Sometimes it works to look at the sources someone uses for his arguments.
These are Computing Forever’s named sources.
1 The sun.
2 An article by a pro-Brexit writer, written for a news website called Heat Street, a libertarian source. The article is otherwise unsupported.
look up : Lukas Mikelionis to get to know the writer.
3 Above article(point 2) is in itself is based on a article by a former UKIP politician writing for the daily mail who cites no sources and is otherwise unsupported.
4 Infowars, a website run Alex Jones, a man who is a libertarian and a conspiracy theorist.
None of his named sources are supported by credible sources like:
I don’t mean that they do not support him. I mean even if they support his claims he doesn’t mention them.
Above link is just an example. Go look for yourself.Check this man’s sources and claims.
Note that Computing Forever hardly uses any credible source even if these supports his claims.
He uses the Guardian once, only to cite a biased interview of a former Greek finance minister who can hardly be viewed as being objective.
Here is a detailed breakdown:
CF opens with an article on Theresa May and Scotland that comes from the sun.
The sun is a tabloid paper with a pro-Brexit stance.
It is also not considered a reliable source.
No other sources support this article.
“She wants to slowly forget about it.”
An unsubstantiated statement by CF.
The Eu “ is an anti-democratic superstate.“
Superstate: Unsupported claim.
It is not a state:
“So many scientists seem to be against leaving out of self-interest.“
Note:there are however sources that support this claim, but CF does not use them. He simply fails to back up his claims even if he can.
“Now I am not saying that is the reason Dawkins is against Brexit, but it wouldn’t surprise me if it was.”
It can be easily found that he is. Did Computing Forever even look?
The #Brexit vote makes me seriously doubt the existence of any sort of human evolution
“Basic research how the EU operates“
a) First mentioned article: 6 Time EU bosses who sneered at the electorate.
This is written by Heat Street, a libertarian news agency by a pro-Brexit writer. He ends the article with: “Vote Leave to wipe the smirk off their faces”
Point by point:
1) Euro parliament president: Referendums for “mentally weak”, “like Nazis”
The underlying source is an article by Janet Atkinson in the daily mail. She mentions no sources and no other sources support what she says. She was a UKIP politician and therefore can be assumed to be a Brexit supporter. More about her here:
As it comes to nazis it was Schulz who was being accused of being one.
See the incident with Godfrey Bloom.
2)“Decisions taken by the most democratic institutions in the world are very often wrong.”
Jose Manuel Barroso 2010
This is an often quoted statement and seems valid enough. Context hard to establish.
3) Rompuy: “But we do it anyway.”
Not accessible, so hard to establish context or validity. I am Dutch so I can read the Standard. Can’t access the page without becomming a member.
4) “Britain belongs to us.”
Quoted out of context if you look at it as Schulz says the UK belongs to the EU(not us) as it is part of it.
But the writer conveniently overlooks Schulz saying that Britain is free to suggest changes as any other member state can at 1:10 into the interview.
5)Juncker: “PM’s listen to voters too much.”
“Elected leaders are making life “difficult” because they spend too much time thinking about what they can get out of EU and kowtowing to public opinion, rather than working on “historic” projects such as the Euro, he said.
6)Trade Commissioner: “I don’t take my mandate from the European People.”
This is quoted by John Hillary in his article. He is an opponent of TTIP for which the Trade Commissioner Cecilia Malmström is responsible. She has denied saying this. See controversy:
b)”Greece Is A Scapegoat For The Disintegration Of The EU”
Based on an interview with the Former Greek minister of Finance.
c)Hate speech code.
Unsourced, so here are the sources Computing Forever fails to mention. Read for yourself.
d)ELITE WILL USE MIGRANTS TO DESTROY EUROPEAN LABOR
This is an article in infowars.
It is run by Alex Jones.
He is a conspiracy theorist.
I can confidently say he is a crackpot. The aritcle is written by Kurt Nimmo, but based on what Alex Jones thinks(see associated movie on website).
“(sarcastic) We should just listen to our politicians? They can never be corrupted, biased or plain wrong on any issue?“
What he seems to claim is that he doesn’t trust in the democratic process with which the country is organized.
“I can’t believe that I bought two of his books.”(about Dawkins)
Apparently, books get only credible when the writer agrees with you in everything even if the books discuss unrelated subjects.
5:25: “Where have I heard this before?“(on a second referendum)
From Nigel Farage.
6:15 : False dichotomy: it is referenda or dictatorship and nothing in between.
Yet, he refuses to vote a second time in the Irish 2009 one. https://youtu.be/pZ9fxpmM1lA?t=66
6:20 “you are anti-democratic to the core.”(to Dawkins)
Dawkins is undemocratic because he says that the decision should have been left to an elected parliament and he proposes a second referendum.
Computing Forever doesn’t like this.
6:25 “Ireland and France were asked again for the Nice and Lisbon treaties because the EU doesn’t care for.”
Referenda are not enforced from the EU. In fact the democratic elected parliaments and governments have to initiate and approve them.
“I will always respect you.”(about Dawkins)
Look back at 4:44 where CF wonders why he bought two books from Dawkins.
And that is the end.
What it all boils down to is that you are watching a video that uses as sources articles from the sun, heat street and infowars, twitter and the like. And biased interviews. The only credible source he mentions is the guardian. Otherwise his statements go unsourced or unexplained.